Quantum of Solace (no spoilers please)

To anyone who has seen it how is it? I read reviews and they say it doesn't seem like a bond film cuz of all the violence in it but overall as a movie how is it?Quantum of Solace (no spoilers please)
I hear that its good, but people have said it wasnt quite as good as Casino Royale. The only negative things were the running time (shortest Bond film yet) and that the villain is supposed to be weak. Other then that its supposed to be good, i plan on seeing it tomorrow.  Quantum of Solace (no spoilers please)
i didnt like it. The first few action scenes were alittle to fast to understand wat was going on. Also i think james bond should use gadgets awesome cars and stuff. Not his fists and a silly pistol constently, like he does in this one.
WTF ?! its short ?! and its not even as good as casino royale which wasted an hour of the movie on a game of poker .
[QUOTE=''Androvinus'']WTF ?! its short ?! and its not even as good as casino royale which wasted an hour of the movie on a game of poker .[/QUOTE] I dont think I can imagine CR without the poker game...And yes I have heard that this new movie is one of the shortest bonds ever and they have left out dialogue, characterisation - I bet the studio did that just to make it more accessible for the audience. I can't see Paul Haggis (who wrote the screenplay) doing that himself. He's too smart for that. 
Its very good, but some people asked me about the story and I had to explain it to them properly.

I liked it a lot, more so than casino royale personally, and the bond girl is my favourite too.

Roger Moore did say he didnt like the new 'darker james bond' but not the movie. But thats the way things are now.

Some small things bothered me too and it is short but you dont realise it.
yea i saw the running time bein under 2 hours and was a little questioned about this because bond film have to be at least 2 hours long. i guess theres a first for everyting
I hear its really good, but I haven't seen it yet.
No story at all really. Basically Bourne meets Mission Impossible. There was even a scene where Bond fought with a book like Bourne does, with the shaky cam and everything. A good action flick, but its forgettable
Just another action flick.
I've only seen the first 15 minutes but in that 15 minutes there were 4 action scenes, way too many if you asked me.Casino Royale>>>Quantum of Solace 
It was good. I don't think it was as good as Casino Royale. but a lot of that is because oh hype. But I think the Bond series needs a good villain. The last good one was Alec Trevelyan in GoldenEye.
Planning on seeing it next weekend from what i have heard its got mixed reactions some like it some don't...
[QUOTE=''Androvinus'']WTF ?! its short ?! and its not even as good as casino royale which wasted an hour of the movie on a game of poker .[/QUOTE]I hope for your sake that you are joking :?  BTW QoS was a great movie just not as amazing as Casino Royal
Honestly the beginning is good but the rest of the movie is absolute garbage. All the action sequences feel similar after the first hour and the plot is so flawed and unclear. The title doesn't make any sense with the movie and it can't even address who the main bad guy was. The worst Bond movie I've ever saw, but I liked the first half hour so much I'd give it a 5/10. I wouldn't recommend someone seeing it, I'd give it a rental.
Wow, so many negative comments.I loved casino royal but I really hope this one is good.
Trust me, its good.
Dont get put off by people.
Its full of action, and good action.
Bond is badass.
They do something at the end which they usually do, but didnt do for casino royale.
Daniel craig said that 'they deserved this bit now' since bond is more developed.
It's good, not as good as Casino Royale, but a good action film still, the start is a bit incoherent but once it calms down it's entertaining.
[QUOTE=''Altiar25'']i didnt like it. The first few action scenes were alittle to fast to understand wat was going on. Also i think james bond should use gadgets awesome cars and stuff. Not his fists and a silly pistol constently, like he does in this one.[/QUOTE]The reason there are no awesome gadgets and stuff is because they realised it's cheesy to have them and it feels more real that way. I didn't really enjoy the other Bond movies because of the cheesiness.
I liked it. Action scenes werent as hard to follow as people make out. The story is quite simple if you actualy think about, and the less than occaisional original bond music is welcome. Opening action is ok, but the theme tune and the title opening were bad. It was still better than some of the old 007 films and promises continuation in the story (I'm hoping they do the next one really well since all the loose ends are sorted out). Considering the quality of some of the ''big films'' recently released, its one of the better ones. Its not as good as casino royale, but with some minor improvements it could be. Watch it, its no Dark Knight, but it will be alot more entertaining than The Kingdom of the crystal skull.